Research Articles Index
Underground Nuclear Power Plants
2009
Several Underground Nuclear Power Plants
(UNPPs) have been operated since the early 1960s in
Europe and the Soviet Union.
Russia is studying plans to build more underground
NPPs using small "mini" naval reactors....
Chernobyl on the Hudson
2009
In September 2004 the Union of Concerned
Scientists published a report into the Indian Point
nuclear power station, located on the Hudson River
35 miles north of New York....
Secret Fallout
2009
"Directly out of the business of nuclear weapons
came the business of nuclear power, heralded in
our country with the slogan, Atoms for Peace. Even
that innocent-sounding slogan is part of the endless
pattern of public deception that surrounds..."
http://www.controlled-demolition.com

Controlled Demolition Inc. are well known in the 911 Truth Movement as the world leading
experts on the subject of controlled demolitions. Many have inferred that their
involvement in the clean-up operation after 911 is evidence that they were involved in
setting up the building for demolition beforehand. I think this is unlikely. I base this on the
revealing interview given by Mr Mark Loizeaux, President of CDI, to New Scientist
magazine published on July 24th 2004. This interview should be read by all 911
researchers - salient extracts are in the "Ground Zero" report.

CDI's web site presents many photographs of controlled demolitions in progress. The
sequence of photographs taken during the demolition of a building in Sao Paulo show very
clearly the famous "squibs" firing out of upper floors at the beginning of the operation,
similar to those seen at the WTC.

There is no doubt that conventional demolition charges were used in the Twin Towers.
Why do this if the towers are going to be destroyed by nuclear devices? The pre-positioned
conventional charges could not possibly have any controlling effect on the power of the
nuclear blast.

The reason - Layers of Deep Black Cover. They know that anyone looking at it afterwards
with any intelligence will see the towers were blown up with enormous force. But they do
not want anyone to suspect it was a nuclear device. So they cover it with evidence of a
conventional controlled demolition. This diverts attention away from the fact that they
were not simply imploded but volcanically exploded, from the top down.

The military use different levels of secrecy and cover stories to mount "Black Ops". One set
of operatives are given one reason for what they are doing. Another team, with no mutual
knowledge of the other teams, is given a different set of tasks with a different cover story
and so on. Everything is compartmentalised on a "need to know" basis so nobody has the
complete picture except a few pulling the strings at the top.

One team, for example, may have been assigned to electronically hijack the aircraft or
direct the "drones" by electronic remote control. They think the new "Gulf of Tonking"
attack will be limited to the aircraft crashes. Level One. Another is assigned to plant the
charges, under pretence of an anti-terrorist exercise. Another squad know it's for real and
oversee it. They don't know it's going to be nuked. Level Two. The "elite" nuclear demolition
team set up what they think are "SADMs" - Small Atomic Demolition Munitions - joking
about how "Saddam" will be blamed. Level Three. They don't know that clandestine
reactors are going to be sent super-critical. Level Four.

On the day, each team performs its job in sequence - unaware that even greater perfidy will
follow, executed by an even Blacker team. Afterwards, people who realise they have been
used can be liquidated. Even the "patriots" who were prepared to go along with a
conventional demolition, to "wake the Americans up for their own good", might have
balked at contaminating New York with hundreds of tonnes of radioactive fallout.


Controlled Demolition
Website Themes by CoffeeCup Software
Killing our Own
2009
"Through the release of atomic energy, our
generation has brought into the world the most
revolutionary force since the prehistoric discovery
of fire. This basic power of the universe cannot be
fitted into the outmoded concept of narrow..."
Tritium
2008
In 2002, the paper "Study of Traces of Tritium at the
World Trade Center" was presented at the American
Chemical Society National Meeting. This paper is
well known in the "911 Truth Movement" for its
presentation of anomalous levels of Tritium...
1700 Designated Ground Zeroes
2008
The National Security Archive Electronic Briefing
Book "New Evidence on the Origins of Overkill"
describes the US military nuclear policy to bring
devastating nuclear power to bear against over
1700 targets in China, the Sviet Union..
The Last Wave from Port Chicago
2008
The first Atomic Test of the modern age took place
at the US Naval Dockyard of Port Chicago, 30 miles
north of San Francisco, at 10.30pm on the 17th July
1944...
Environmental Studies of the WTC Area
2007
This link is to the Forensic Data which proves that
the WTC was subjected to intense nuclear
explosions. On September 17th and 18th 2001, two
scientists from the USGS collected samples of dust
from Lower Manhattan...
Project Gabriel
2007
In the 1950s Project Gabriel was a project to
determine how nuclear fallout from US atomic
bomb tests is distributed across the world and the
biological uptake of fallout products.
The Trouble with Steven E. Jones' 911 Research
2007
This is an article by Morgan Reynolds on Professor
Steven Jones and his well known “thermite” theory for
the destruction of the Twin Towers. There are some
very interesting photographs, of the streets being
washed...
Controlled Demolition Inc.
2007
Controlled Demolition Inc. are by now well known
in the 911 Truth Movement as the world leading
experts on the subject of controlled demolitions.
Many have inferred that their involvement in the
clean-up operation after 911 is evidence...